![]() ![]() LPD-28 and LPD-29 – which are both part of the LPD-17 Flight I line but are considered transition ships to Flight II – cost $1.66 billion and $1.62 billion, respectively, also in base FY 2014 dollars, according to Berger. The commandant argued that HII’s Ingalls Shipbuilding is approaching the point in the line where they can see cost savings and that increased costs to buy new LPDs are because of inflation.īerger described LPD-27, part of the Flight I line, as a $2 billion ship in base FY 2014 dollars. David Berger made the case for the LPD-17 Flight II line and said a block buy acquisition strategy is the way to pursue the ships to save money. At the same conference, Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Marine Corps Photoīut the Marine Corps has a different take. Marine Corps UH-1Y Venom and AH-1Z Viper pilots with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 362 (Rein.), 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit, fly next to the amphibious transport dock USS Anchorage (LPD 23), Jan. Actually, with that production line and that ship, it’s not competitive. ![]() “It’s not going to drive down the price of that ship. Now let’s roll up our sleeves and talk about price,’” Gilday said. But to go after a single ship in ‘25, and put that in the budget now – based on where we are with all this churn on cost and so forth and this concern about the cost of those ships – it’s like telling a car dealer, ‘hey I really want to buy that minivan. “Congress has given us the authorities in the latest to do a bundle buy and we all agree that that’s the way that we ought to go after these ships. Because of the two-year centers, Gilday said the Navy has time to evaluate the LPD-17 Flight II line. The Navy could buy LPD-33 in FY 2025 if it followed industry’s recommendation to order the ships every two years to keep a stable work force and maintain the supply chain. The Navy wanted that ship to be the last LPD-17 Flight II purchase, as the service last year tried to end the line early after only buying three ships instead of the originally planned 13.Īfter appeals from the Marine Corps for advanced procurement funding for LPD-33, lawmakers opted to continue the line and allotted $250 million in advanced procurement dollars for that ship in the FY 2023 funding and policy bills.īut the service did not include the ship in its five-year budget outlook released Monday. The Navy has yet to issue the award for LPD-32, which Congress authorized and appropriated funding for in Fiscal Year 2023. The pause on buying amphibious ships is so the Navy can perform a Battle Force Ship Assessment and Requirements Study, which will help inform amphibious ship buys and likely wrap up in the third quarter of FY 2023, and evaluate both possible cost savings and capabilities, officials have said. The FY- ship, unless we did a bundle buy, would likely be a $2 billion or above – at least a 25 percent increase. “So that increase will be somewhere between 21 and 25 percent. The third one that we’re contracting for right now is probably going to be between $1.9 and $2 billion,” Gilday said about LPD-30, LPD-31, and LPD-32, respectively. “The cost of that ship had gone from $1.47 billion to the second ship at $1.5. Mike Gilday said at the annual McAleese Conference. The pause to reassess the LPD-17 Flight II line started a year ago at the direction of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. – The Navy halted its pursuit of the San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock line because of the program’s growing costs and delays in the shipyard, the service’s top officer said Wednesday. This story has been updated to include additional information about ship cost numbers from Marine Corps Commandant Gen. ![]() The future USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28) departed Huntington Ingalls Shipyard to conduct Acceptance Trials in the Gulf of Mexico. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |